20190820

“Relationship Reconnected” A Practical Application Of Communication Theory


I just had the pleasure of finishing Dr. David Simonsen’s book, Relationship Reconnected (Rockridge Press, 2019). Full disclosure: Dr. Simonsen and I have been acquainted for about fifteen years.

The book is a practical walk-through of a specific conversation technique that encourages couples to communicate, rather than fight, about disagreements.

Dr. Simonsen uses the work of psychologist Marshall Rosenberg called, “Non-Violent Communication” (NVC). The technique title seems off-putting (“violent?!”), but Simonsen clarifies this: communication that does no violence to the relationship of the people communicating. Dr. Simonsen then applies the ideas and techniques of NVC (applicable to any relationship) specifically to couples in a family setting.

Credibility is established for Dr. Simonsen’s expertise and motivation – and he sets a stage of communication dysfunction that the reader may recognize in their own life. What is it like to be in a relationship where communication has broken down? How did the relationship get there? Is there hope for improvement? What is the cost? As Simonsen sets this stage, he states one of his most fascinating notions: the difference between emotion (our reaction) and our feelings (what we perceive the situation).

The technique of NVC involves simple-to-name, but (as Dr. Simonsen fully admits) hard to do, ‘steps.’ These include:
1.    Observe the Facts – re-cast your perception of what your partner is doing or saying in neutral terms. Pay attention to the situation; strive to focus on the objective facts – get the facts straight. Tamp down on the reactive emotion you are tempted to experience. Be present, keep judgment out, and stay in the moment.
2.    Identify your Feelings – introspectively recognize what you are feeling. In this step, stay focused on your own feelings, not what your partner is doing using “I” language.
3.    Name your Needs – we all have needs, and recognizing those needs is important to understand your feelings. This is where Dr. Simonsen’s experience as a counselor comes through – and where this book’s place as a tool to be used with an insightful counselor becomes obvious. Getting through this stage can be difficult and, seems to me, best done with the perspective of another gracious and mature helper.
4.    Make the Ask – request that your need be met by your partner. Simonsen makes the helpful condition of asking what you want your partner to do, don’t ask them to not do something. A good ask isn’t about making a demand (“You should …”), but a request. To do this step right, it seems essential that the hard work of the previous three steps are done so you do not merely state your position, but actually address your interests.

As I mentioned, I particularly liked the brief discussion on the distinction between “emotion” and “feelings;” which seemed an important insight. The specific and practical application of NVC to the arena of couples’ conflict is well-done and accessible. The ready acknowledgment of the initial awkwardness of the NVC steps was refreshing and encouraging. I specifically appreciated Dr. Simonsen’s brief explanations as to why each step is important and contributes to better communication.

I would have enjoyed (perhaps another book?) more on the distinction between “emotion” and “feelings;” and especially how to keep that reactive, reactionary emotion in check in the heat of a conflict. Also, it seems to me that it would have been helpful to include some discussion of roadblocks to get through a particular step – what if I just can’t get a grip on my true needs; what then?

However, I recommend the book to couples who want to get out of the rut of destructive and non-productive communication. This book can be a helpful tool to that end. I strongly suggest that couples also use this book in partnership with a competent counselor.

20190814

Math Reality

Found this quote:

"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality."

- Albert Einstein (1879-1955); German-American Theoretical Physicist

20190810

The Only Way To Fly!



I have been alive for many decades and grew up when traveling by airplane was a luxurious adventure. Back in the late 70’s I remember flying a long-distance flight in coach that served a full and tasty dinner with silverware and even a small bottle of wine. I have watched as strong competition forced a race to the bottom where air passengers are now excited when they get pretzels for their ‘meal.’ Ah, for the Good Old Days.
Can we agree that those days are gone and may never return?
OK.
Then there’s the other part about air travel I don’t like. I’m tall. Six foot and three inches worth. Additionally, as I’m now firmly in middle age, I’m a bit wider than the svelte days during my 20’s. I do not book non-stops across the country because I can’t stand to be cramped in the little stall for five hours in a stretch.
And, getting to the bottom dollar, air fares are usually very expensive.
I am completing an overdue vacation with my wife and we decided to take the train. Yep, the old-fashioned steel-wheel on steel-rail train. Now, let’s set the context. We live in the United States so saying that we take the train for vacation is an unusual statement here. That is not so in Europe where one travels on vacation – of course – by train.
The particular trip we took meant an overnight train both ways. It was sooooo much nicer than the cramped confines of a modern aircraft. The seats are wider, cushioned, you can walk around, go to other cars for a meal or just see the scenery go by at ground level. There is something qualitatively different about seeing the country pass by you in that way. It is the same phenomena as the road trip. You get a human-scale view of distance, time, and just how long the distances are. Passing by community, fields, industry, urban centers, hills, et cetera – things sequentially coming and going at a sequential space that you can register in a relatable scale (‘Oh, look at that horse; isn’t that barn interesting? I wonder how many people work in that factory?) – this gives a raw experience of landscape.
Sure, there are disadvantages to train travel. It is much slower. But if you see the pace as part of the trip itself (travel as process, not merely destination), then it is part of the adventure.
Yes, trains are bumpy; but the powers that be don’t make you stay in your seat when there is turbulence.
Yes, they occasionally run late – as if there were never any late arriving flights. But, let’s just pull back a bit and I will suggest that if you are vacationing and your timetable is that tightly scheduled, you’ve built stress into your rest. You’re doing your vacation wrong. Train travel for business has advantages but I understand that most business trips for most of the nation do not fit rail travel, excepting the eastern seaboard.
Trains are about as expensive as air travel and about as fast as an automobile, without the stress of either.